08 05 06
Crathes, Drumoak & Durris Community Council
(CDDCC)
Minutes of Meeting
Tuesday
6 May 2008 – Irvine Arms, Drumoak from 19.30 hours
1. Sederunt
Community
Councillors:
Aberdeenshire
Councillors (Ward 16): Linda Clark
Aberdeenshire Councillors (Ward 18): Wendy Agnew, Graeme Clark
Apologies:
2.
Minutes of March 2008 and Notes of April 2008 meeting
It was
noted that the reason that Banchory Library no longer displayed planning
application plans was because of “lack of space”.
With the
above-noted exception, the minutes of March 2008 and notes of April 2008 were
both proposed by Jenny Watson and seconded by
3. Matters
Arising from Notes of April 2008 meeting
3.1 Drumoak Sewage Treatment Plant
Graeme
Clark reported his understanding of the outcome of the meeting of 1 May 2008 at
Viewmount (at which he was unable to be present). Minutes of the meeting would be issued in due
course. Salient points of a preliminary
note of the meeting were:-
·
“Contrary
to popular belief, Stewart Milne is not obliged by way of planning conditions
to upgrade the sewage treatment plant nor to provide a (sewerage) connection to
·
Stewart
Milne is prepared to contribute towards an upgrading based on the SEPA
standards applying at the time of development, although whether this were a
planning gain requirement or a selfless act of philanthropy was not recorded
·
Scottish
Water have still not authorised funds for the upgrade and “there is little
prospect” of this happening before April 2009
·
The
70 metre connection from
·
The
Council has other – unfunded - schemes for
·
The
Council questions whether the sewerage connection, etc. would be worth doing,
given that “hopefully a new school will be coming soon”
CDDCC
unanimously rejected the idea that the sewerage connection, etc. should be
cancelled simply because an unfunded and, so far, distinctly hypothetical new
school might provide a retrospective excuse for lengthy inaction.
3.2 Proposed Used Car Sales business adjacent to
Drumoak Farm Shop site
The planning
application had not yet been scheduled for consideration by the K&M Area
Committee.
3.3 Durris
and
At one stage, it had been understood that Bert
McIntosh might be prepared to undertake gratis the necessary ground-works for
the proposed car park opposite
Planning gain from the new Durris housing
development was “unlikely to be available” for a school car park. This was because children living in those
houses would not use the bus and hence the perceived need for the car park was
logically unrelated to that development.
To contact both
It was noted that – apparently – Community Councils
could obtain a 50% discount on the cost of planning applications. To take this into account when submitting the
above applications (Action:
Linda Clark suggested that part of the cost of the
car parks might be reclaimable from the “Safer Routes to School” funding.
3.4
Myrebird Junction
3.5
Graeme Clark reported that the K&M Area
Committee had authorised the 3 tonne MGW limit, over-ruling objections from two
local farmers.
There was much discussion of the inconvenience to
the two objecting farmers and of the possible impact of farm vehicles on
It was also noted that emergency vehicles might not
be able to use the bridge at the lower weight limit. This did not seem to be an insuperable problem
since (a) fire engines carrying water would be over the existing 4 tonne limit
(b) ambulances and police vehicles would be below the new 3 tonne MGW limit (c)
given the geographic locations of the fire and ambulance stations, little or no
delay would be likely as a result of taking the South Deeside, rather than
North Deeside, Road.
It was agreed that the structural and visual
integrity of this A-listed bridge was paramount.
Note:
The new signs were erected shortly after the meeting.
4. Drumoak Youth Project
In the absence of
5. Planning and Other Issues
5.1 Crathes and Durris
Nothing
new to report.
5.2 Drumoak
5.21 Outline Planning Application for house at land
NE of Park Smithy
The application
claims that this house is for an agricultural worker. A 27 page 'supporting statement' has also
been submitted. The new house is
proposed to be nearly 500 yards to the north of the A 93. On the assumption that this was a valid
agricultural worker application, CDDCC had no comment.
5.22 Application to turn a bothy into a small
cottage at Newhall Drumoak (near
As the bothy building
is already in place, CDDCC had no comment.
5.23 Large Implement Shed to W of Sewage Treatment Works
CDDCC had no comment.
6. Correspondence
6.1 Draft Structure Plan
An email
had been received relating to the availability of the draft Structure Plan (due
late May 2008). To write asking that
CDDCC be included in the consultation process (Action:
6.2
To
respond on behalf of CDDCC (Action:
6.3 Data Protection Registration
Individuals (including members) sympathetic to the aims of CDDCC could – as volunteers and not as agents of a statutory body – send emails, produce minutes, run a website etc. without being required to register, since they personally would benefit from the domestic (including recreational) and/or journalistic exemptions from the DP Act.
To write
to the Area Managers for K&M and Marr, the local MSP and MP and to ASCC, drawing
attention to CDDCC’s interpretation of the DP Act in relation to Community
Councils (Action:
6.4 Core Path Scheme (Barrowsgate)
To send a
“holding” reply to Jim Brunton (Action:
To send a
detailed reply to Jim Brunton (Action:
6.5 Community
Empowerment Update
CDDCC expressed itself baffled by this latest
piece of “initiative-itis”, which seemed to duplicate several previous
officially-sponsored projects.
6.6 Consultation on Draft
Model Scheme for Establishment of Community Councils and Draft Code of Conduct
for Community Councillors
To reply on behalf of CDDCC (Action:
6.7 ASCC Constitution
Consultation
Since CDDCC has chosen not to be a member of
ASCC, it was thought inappropriate to comment on its proposed constitution.
6.8 Complaint about litter
near bus shelter
A complaint had been received from Iain
Campbell of
6.9 Consultation on Changes
to BT Phonebox Network
Given that no payphones are proposed for
removal in the CDDCC area in the present review, no comment would be made.
7. AOCB
7.1 Bicycle
Ride
To decide upon a date (probably 22 June)
and route (probably simple and on the local part of the
7.2 Attendance
of Police at CDDCC meetings
Jenny Watson queried why representatives of the police had ceased attending CDDCC meetings.
If they had been present, it would have provided the opportunity to draw to their attention the serious seasonal problem of speeding motorcycles.
7.3
Chairmanship Arrangements for June meeting
It was agreed that, in the potential
absence of
7.4 Royal Bank of
To ask
the Branch Manager for continued exemption from charges, on charitable grounds (Action:
8. Next Meeting
1930 hours, 3 June 2008, Irvine Arms, Drumoak
JFH 08/05/08
|
Distribution |
|||
|
Email |
Email |
Post |
Other |
|
CDDCC Councillors (excl. Jenny Watson) |
Neighbourhood Watch
Co-ordinator – |
Jenny Watson |
Website
www.durris.net (also for previous
minutes) |
|
Cllrs. Linda Clark, Karen Clark, Jill Webster (Ward 16) |
Leanna
MacLarty (Press and Journal) |
Crathes Hall Notice Board (via David Humble) |
|
|
Cllrs. Peter Bellarby, Graeme Clark, Mike Sullivan, Wendy Agnew (Ward
18) |
Durris
Hall Notice Board (via |
Community
Police Officer (Drumoak/Durris/Crathes), c/o Banchory Police Office |
|
|
Mr W Munro, Area Manager, Kincardine & Mearns |
Rev. |
Drumoak Public Hall Notice Board (via Ian Pirie) |
By Hand |
|
Mr L Allen, Area Manager, Marr |
|
Banchory
Public Library |
Park
Shop (via |
|
|
|
Drumoak Church Hall Notice Board (via Morag Keith) |
Drumoak
Post Office (via |